ÇØÇÇÀüÈ­¿µ¾î,È­»ó¿µ¾î ÁÜÈ­»ó¿µ¾î,¾î¸°ÀÌÈ­»ó¿µ¾î,ÃʵîÈ­»ó¿µ¾î,¼ºÀÎÈ­»ó¿µ¾î

Home > ¸¶ÀÌÆäÀÌÁö > ¿µÀڽŹ®

- ³¯Â¥º° ½Å¹® È®ÀÎ

easy ¿µÀڽŹ®
difficult ¿µÀڽŹ®


 
Topic : Teen dies after shop spreads images of her shoplifting
2025È£ 12¸é
 
TITLE : Teen dies after shop spreads images of her shoplifting

Teen dies after shop spreads images of her shoplifting



 

 


The death of a high school student in South Chungcheong Province after images of her taking ice cream from an unmanned store circulated among local teenagers has triggered a new public debate over privacy.

 

According to local reports, the 18-year-old, identified as Lee, was found dead at her home in Hongseong on Sept. 23, just a few days after the store owner sent images of her stealing to a local tutoring room.

 

The photos were then shared with students there and quickly circulated among teenagers in the region, soon reaching Lee and her family.

 

She reportedly suffered extreme anxiety after the images were revealed.

 

She is said to have expressed her frustration in text messages to friends, such as “What do I do … my heart is shaking,” “How can I show my face in Hongseong? How am I supposed to handle these rumors?”

 

Her brother said she also confided in him the night before, saying she didn’t know how to move forward. Their mother planned to meet the store owner the next day to resolve the matter, but Lee died by suicide the following morning.

 

The family has filed complaints with police, accusing the unmanned store owner of violating the Personal Information Protection Act and the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization. The head of the study room who shared the photos is also accused of violating information communication laws.

 

Lee’s father said his daughter “became the target of ridicule and humiliation because of illegally distributed CCTV images,” adding that she collapsed under “fear and despair.”

 

It has become common for shops to display images of shoplifters caught on camera, but the case has sparked widespread online debate over whether releasing unblurred security camera images is ever justified.

 

Many argue that minors committing petty theft should be handled through legal procedures, not public exposure, and that the spread of identifying images constitutes a form of digital mob justice.

 

At the same time, some small business owners, especially those running unmanned stores, which are often targets of theft, say they feel they have no other way to protect their livelihoods. Several have written online that repeated losses from shoplifting threaten their ability to keep their businesses open, and that “exposure feels like the only deterrent left.”

 

Legal experts warn that regardless of financial pressures, publishing identifiable images is illegal and can result in defamation or privacy violations.

 

In a 2022 case, a store owner in Incheon was fined after posting a child’s photo over an alleged theft of Pokemon cards.

 

“Shoplifting must be addressed through police reports and legal processes,” one expert said. “The public circulation of images, especially of minors, can inflict irreversible harm.”

 

Police are investigating the circumstances surrounding the image leak as well as the family’s allegations.

 

 

Source : https://www.koreaherald.com/article/10626538

 

Comprehension

What incident led to the circulation of images of the student, Lee?
Who first shared the images, and with whom were they shared?
How did the images spread among local teenagers?
What emotional reactions did Lee reportedly have after seeing the images?
What actions were Lee¡¯s family planning to take before her death?
Why has this case sparked debate about the release of security camera images?
What have legal experts said about sharing identifiable images of minors?

Discussion

Should shop owners ever be allowed to publicly release CCTV images of suspected shoplifters? Why or why not?
How can communities balance protecting businesses with protecting individuals¡¯ privacy rights?
What responsibilities do adults have when handling sensitive information involving minors?
How does the viral spread of images among teenagers contribute to emotional harm?
Do you think ¡°digital mob justice¡± is becoming more common? What dangers does it pose?
What alternatives could unmanned store owners use instead of exposing suspects online?
How should schools or local communities support teenagers who become targets of public embarrassment?
What changes, if any, should be made to privacy laws regarding security camera footage?

Vocabulary

Circulate – To spread or pass from one person to another.
Anxiety – Strong worry or nervousness.
Ridicule – Mockery; making someone feel foolish.
Humiliation – Deep embarrassment or shame.
Deterrent – Something that discourages someone from doing something.
Defamation – The act of damaging someone¡¯s reputation by sharing harmful information.
Irreversible – Unable to be undone or changed.
Violation – Breaking a law, rule, or agreement.