ÇØÇÇÀüÈ­¿µ¾î,È­»ó¿µ¾î ÁÜÈ­»ó¿µ¾î,¾î¸°ÀÌÈ­»ó¿µ¾î,ÃʵîÈ­»ó¿µ¾î,¼ºÀÎÈ­»ó¿µ¾î

Home > ¸¶ÀÌÆäÀÌÁö > ¿µÀڽŹ®

- ³¯Â¥º° ½Å¹® È®ÀÎ

easy ¿µÀڽŹ®
difficult ¿µÀڽŹ®


 
Topic : Seoul council proposal to limit welfare programs based on nationality sparks criticism
2025È£ 11¸é
 
TITLE : Seoul council proposal to limit welfare programs based on nationality sparks criticism

Seoul council proposal to limit welfare programs based on nationality sparks criticism

 

 

Seoul council proposal to limit welfare ...


 

 

Councilor claims measure aimed at preventing 'reverse discrimination' against Korean citizens


A proposed ordinance at the Seoul Metropolitan Council has sparked controversy, as it would allow the city government to differentiate welfare and support programs for foreign residents based on nationality.

 

According to the council, Shim Mi-kyung, a council member from the conservative People Power Party, along with 32 party colleagues, recently introduced a bill to make foreign residents eligible for certain city-funded programs only if their home countries provide similar benefits to Korean nationals.

 

It would also require the mayor to review whether those countries provide similar support before implementing policies aimed at assisting foreign nationals.


Under the proposal, foreign nationals could be excluded from city support programs if their home countries fail to provide equivalent benefits or if Koreans are deemed to face discriminatory treatment there.

 

Exceptions would be made for refugees, those in need of humanitarian aid and foreign entrepreneurs or skilled workers who contribute to the local economy and job market.

 

The bill, introduced in late October, has not yet been referred to the Urban Planning and Balanced Development Committee, which handles related matters.

 

The Seoul branch of the minor progressive Basic Income Party denounced the bill as "blatant racial discrimination and violation of human rights."

 

"The principle of reciprocity is a concept used in diplomacy between states, not something that can be applied to individual residents," the party said in a statement. "As public officials representing the citizens of Seoul, the proposers should withdraw this ordinance immediately if they have any sense of conscience."

 

Critics have also questioned the bill's feasibility, noting that the Seoul Metropolitan Government, as a local body, may lack the authority to assess the welfare systems of foreign central governments. They added that such an initiative would run counter to the city government's efforts to globalize the city.

 

As of 2024, about 440,000 foreign residents were living in Seoul, accounting for 4.7 percent of the city’s population.

 

In response to criticism, Shim dismissed claims that the bill is discriminatory, saying it aims to enhance transparency and fairness in welfare programs.

 

"The Seoul Metropolitan Government currently operates various welfare, economic and social support programs without distinguishing between Koreans and foreign nationals, but some countries do not provide similar benefits to Korean nationals," Shim told The Korea Times Thursday.

 

"For example, as the number of business owners increases among foreign nationals, there have been cases in which recipients of small business loan guarantees left the country without repaying their debts. The system needs greater transparency."

 

She added that the measure seeks to "promote fairness and prevent reverse discrimination against Korean citizens," adding that linking it to racial discrimination is inappropriate.

 

"As more foreign residents settle in the city, establishing clear and transparent rules will ultimately help Seoul become a more globalized city."

 

Source : https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/southkorea/globalcommunity/20251106/seoul-council-proposal-to-limit-welfare-programs-based-on-nationality-sparks-criticism

 

Comprehension

What is the main purpose of the proposed ordinance introduced by Councilor Shim Mi-kyung?
What condition would foreign residents need to meet to be eligible for certain welfare programs under the bill?
Which political party does Councilor Shim Mi-kyung belong to?
What exceptions are included in the proposed ordinance?
What criticism has the Basic Income Party made about the bill?
Why do critics question the bill¡¯s feasibility?
How many foreign residents currently live in Seoul, and what percentage of the population do they make up?
What reason did Shim give for proposing the measure?

Discussion

Do you think welfare programs should be available to all residents, regardless of nationality? Why or why not?
What do you understand by the term ¡°reverse discrimination¡±?
Should local governments have the power to make decisions based on other countries¡¯ welfare systems?
How can a city balance fairness to citizens with inclusion of foreign residents?
What challenges might arise when implementing such a law?
Do you think excluding foreigners from certain programs could affect Seoul¡¯s global image? Explain.
What might be the benefits of requiring more transparency in welfare programs?
How should the government handle cases where foreign recipients misuse financial support or leave debts behind?
What does it mean for a city to be ¡°globalized¡±? How does inclusivity play a role in that?
If you were a city council member, how would you design a fair welfare system for both citizens and foreign residents?

Vocabulary

Ordinance – a law or regulation made by a local government.
Reciprocity – the practice of giving benefits in return for similar treatment.
Discrimination – unfair treatment of people based on race, nationality, or other factors.
Feasibility – the practicality or possibility of doing something.
Eligibility – the state of meeting the requirements to participate in something.
Transparency – openness and honesty about actions or decisions.
Humanitarian – related to helping people in need or protecting human welfare.
Fairness – treating everyone equally and justly.